Princeton vs. Merrimack, Corsi

This is the second part of a series analyzing Corsi numbers from Princeton.

Since Corsi is best used when the score is close (a tied game or a one-goal difference) I only calculated Corsi from the first period, before Merrimack accrued a two-goal lead. 

While talking about goalkeeper Ben Halford’s play, Princeton coach Ron Fogarty spoke a little of how the game changes based on the score:

“If a team gets up 5-0, they’re going to back off a little bit and just start looking at the scoreboard a little bit, so the dynamics of the game’s going to change as well with that type of the lead.”

Because Merrimack led 2-0 in the first period, the Corsi numbers are a very small sample size. The Warriors also had a couple of power plays in the period, which lowered 5-on-5 playing time.

Here are the numbers:

Corsi-close 5-on-5: 37.5 percent

Corsi-close total: 33.33 percent

Again, Corsi can tell us roughly how often a team possess the puck, but not what kind of scoring chances a team gets. Princeton did a good job of keeping Merrimack’s shots to the perimeter in the first, but the Warriors scored when they came close to the net.

Stay tuned for more next week.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s